|
Post by sclcookie on Jun 20, 2005 17:36:19 GMT -5
Okay, here's what I posted in Richard Cartwright's Guestbook on one of his sites.:You know, I kept wondering why the hell is a pro still interested in prooving Rich is guilty. Rich was executed over a month ago. I was thinking, maybe it's no closure....I don't think that's it. I think you're scare. You're scare his name is going to be cleared cause you KNOW he's innocent and if that's proven, that's another step toward abolishing the death penalty. Don't worry, I'll make sure others read these posts. I'm sure they'll be quite interested. hugggz, Suzanne here's the link: drprisoners.tripod.com/rcartwright.htmlYou know, I couldn't figure why I was still getting hate e mail after Rich's execution....I don't know why I didn't think of it! Hey, please no nasty comments about Rich....you can debate the issue, but his Mom is a member here. hugggz, Suzanne
|
|
|
Post by sclcookie on Jun 20, 2005 21:05:12 GMT -5
You know, I have good reason to be signing Rich's guestbook. I'm keeping his memory alive and will fight to keep his name good.
What's funny to me is if he's so guilty, why is the a pro or more than one pro still trying to prove his guilty via Rich's guestbook. It's not like that would have any significance anymore being that Rich is already executed. It's not like we can bring him back to life in order to execute him again.
Maybe it's because this pro or these pros are afraid his name will be cleared? But it's not like they can prevent that from posting in his guestbook though.
So what's the point?
I'll tell you again what I think. They are scared....it's as simple as that.
|
|
|
Post by sclcookie on Jun 20, 2005 21:18:28 GMT -5
That pro or those pros are still posting in there?!!! Proving my point! Can you believe it?!
hugggz, Suzanne
|
|
|
Post by freerob on Jun 20, 2005 23:33:18 GMT -5
That pro or those pros are still posting in there?!!! Proving my point! Can you believe it?! hugggz, Suzanne Hey Suzanne, I've been having the same issue with Rich's Condolence Book on his website. Every now and again another a**hole 'tries' to leave vile messages, but guess what??? They are NEVER published on his Book cause it is 100% moderated. So to all you f*cking a**holes that think you can hurt the Cartwright family by writing crap in his book... FORGET IT, it never get's on there. You get DELETED WAY before then! Ha Ha!! Let them be the 'school' bullies that they are, but I for one am NOT intimidated and my focus remains, to keep Rich's name and memory ALIVE and to get this repulsive DP abolished. Miles xx
|
|
|
Post by lostlove84 on Jun 25, 2005 1:45:02 GMT -5
Let me say something here, and please do not take this the wrong way. You know it may not be a PRO that is doing this. It could be anja, look what she is doing to pams web pages. She will use any name that she can come up with, even lonnies name. I would put nothing past her. But then it may also be a pro that is doing it, I hope its not because what good does it get you to do something like that. But I made a post on another page telling everyone that when she gets mad she finds anyway that she can to hurt people and that she has even gone after web pages that people have setup in honor of there loved one. Why would she not do the same to his page? I am not saying that is not a pro, but then I dont know who it is so I am not going to say it is one person, but only WHO it COULD be.
|
|
|
Post by freerob on Jun 25, 2005 4:30:42 GMT -5
Let me say something here, and please do not take this the wrong way. You know it may not be a PRO that is doing this. It could be anja, look what she is doing to pams web pages. She will use any name that she can come up with, even lonnies name. I would put nothing past her. But then it may also be a pro that is doing it, I hope its not because what good does it get you to do something like that. But I made a post on another page telling everyone that when she gets mad she finds anyway that she can to hurt people and that she has even gone after web pages that people have setup in honor of there loved one. Why would she not do the same to his page? I am not saying that is not a pro, but then I dont know who it is so I am not going to say it is one person, but only WHO it COULD be. Shawnie, You may well be correct. It could be her. However WHOEVER it was, regardless, has to have a screw loose or that 'the lights are on but no-ones at home'. It's totally disrespectful and uncalled for. Best Miles
|
|
|
Post by lostlove84 on Jun 25, 2005 4:44:21 GMT -5
Let me say something here, and please do not take this the wrong way. You know it may not be a PRO that is doing this. It could be anja, look what she is doing to pams web pages. She will use any name that she can come up with, even lonnies name. I would put nothing past her. But then it may also be a pro that is doing it, I hope its not because what good does it get you to do something like that. But I made a post on another page telling everyone that when she gets mad she finds anyway that she can to hurt people and that she has even gone after web pages that people have setup in honor of there loved one. Why would she not do the same to his page? I am not saying that is not a pro, but then I dont know who it is so I am not going to say it is one person, but only WHO it COULD be. Shawnie, You may well be correct. It could be her. However WHOEVER it was, regardless, has to have a screw loose or that 'the lights are on but no-ones at home'. It's totally disrespectful and uncalled for. Best Miles I agree with you 100%. There is no point in doing something like that if you no matter if you are pro or anti.
|
|
|
Post by sclcookie on Jun 25, 2005 7:43:01 GMT -5
I'm sure it's not Anja.....if you go back through older posts, you'll see some similarities with other pro posts on his guestbook.
|
|
|
Post by freerob on Jun 25, 2005 15:18:10 GMT -5
I'm sure it's not Anja.....if you go back through older posts, you'll see some similarities with other pro posts on his guestbook. I agree Suzanne. I know Benty left a message. Wasn't bad, but it wasn't something that Rich's family would find of any condolence so it was deleted. The website was made for Rich's family. The 'other victims'. I'm fiercely loyal to them and will protect his website/memory entirely. I just roll my eyes when negative enteries are 'attempted' to be added. They CAN'T and WON'T be included. They have to go through Moderation first. I fail to understand the mentality. These saddo's are just wasting their time. It takes me 3 seconds to delete their potential post, wonder how long it takes them to write it??? So who's time is wasted? Best always Miles xx
|
|
|
Post by sclcookie on Jul 2, 2005 7:40:15 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by sclcookie on Jul 2, 2005 7:58:48 GMT -5
You know, I have a new article of Clint's to type up. And don't get me wrong, I like Clint and I'm thankful he took over the Uncensored.
But it should be Rich's articles I'm typing up.
I'm heading for bed and gonna cry myself to sleep. Night y'all.
hugggz, Suzanne
|
|
|
Post by tinachurch on Jul 2, 2005 9:25:49 GMT -5
I can't imagine who would stoop so low to write anything in such sacred territory negative about Rich. If anyone wants to debate Rich's guilt or innocence please have them contact me. As his investigator I would be more than happy to show them the innocence. It breaks my heart, but this entire country will soon know the impact that Rich had on so many lives! ;D
|
|
|
Post by garp on Jul 3, 2005 1:03:01 GMT -5
His last statement sounds so "innocent" : Yes, I do. I just want to thank all my friends and family who gave me support these past eight years. I want to apologize to the victim's family for the pain I caused them. And to everyone at the Polunsky Unit, just keep your heads up and stay strong.
This choir boy was guilty of a horrible crime and his final statement proves that. I don't feel bad for him I feel bad for the person he butchered.
|
|
|
Post by sclcookie on Jul 3, 2005 1:04:45 GMT -5
Rich was innocent. He didn't shoot Nick. Rich was a part of the robbery, however, that's not what Rich was executed for. Rich was executed for shooting Nick, a crime Rich did not commit.
|
|
|
Post by garp on Jul 3, 2005 1:11:32 GMT -5
He was there, just another criminal who got caught and then cries about it later, more worried about saving his own skin than of what he did to take the life of an innocent person. He should have made better choices then to be a criminal. He could have worked at target or a 7-11 and lived a long life. Took the wrong road and he wound up getting what murders deserve. Why should his fate be better than that of his victim?
|
|