|
Post by mikebook on Jul 18, 2005 7:35:17 GMT -5
That is OK. However, Tina, Post all the stuff that you have. I would like to see it. You say he was innocent of murder, so post the information. I believe what I have been reading and he fired the shot. Please post the information...
|
|
|
Post by paleone on Jul 18, 2005 8:41:46 GMT -5
That is OK. However, Tina, Post all the stuff that you have. I would like to see it. You say he was innocent of murder, so post the information. I believe what I have been reading and he fired the shot. Please post the information... i have no clue what you are reading, but you tell tina to post hers...i have posted the truth, there are links to PDF files that show overstreet's handwritten letter...and you have proven nothing that says he has shot any shots....does it make you feel more comfortable in your justice system to just stick your head in the sand and try to justify that he really shot the shot?
|
|
|
Post by sclcookie on Jul 18, 2005 8:50:39 GMT -5
That is OK. However, Tina, Post all the stuff that you have. I would like to see it. You say he was innocent of murder, so post the information. I believe what I have been reading and he fired the shot. Please post the information... Tina, please don't post what you have. There is nothing to prove here. Rich is already executed. When the time comes, everyone will know Rich is innocent. I'm sorry, but I don't think it's necessary anymore. Rich is already dead. I'm an honest person. Tina is honest. If you don't trust what we're saying than you don't know us very well. Tina, please keep it privileged information to prove his innocence rather than a show here for all "lurkers" etc. Yes, I will still say he's innocent, however, there is nothing to prove. I know he's innocent and that's really all that matters right now. hugggz, Suzanne
|
|
|
Post by mikebook on Jul 18, 2005 9:27:54 GMT -5
I have seen the letters. I have read everything on CCADP, your site, what was in the press, and anything else I could find. It all points to the trigger person as Richard Cartwright. That is the truth as I do see it. The letters from Overstreet do not prove anything to me, just as they proved nothing to the prosecutor. It does not matter what he wrote because he is a convict and would turn in his own mother for favors and candy... Believe what you will, but you are delusional...
|
|
|
Post by sclcookie on Jul 18, 2005 9:41:06 GMT -5
Mike, don't worry about it, ok.
I'm not delusional. I know. Just don't worry about it.
Rich was my brother. I wish you would have known him. You wouldn't doubt his innocence if you did know him, but you didn't, so maybe being that he's executed, you're resting better (correct me if i'm wrong on that).
I know I'm not resting better, knowing that Rich was executed, esp. with him being innocent.
|
|
|
Post by sclcookie on Jul 18, 2005 9:42:38 GMT -5
Please don't call me delusional about Rich's innocence, Mike.
|
|
|
Post by mikebook on Jul 18, 2005 9:45:53 GMT -5
Sorry. I get upset about this at times...
|
|
|
Post by sclcookie on Jul 18, 2005 9:49:50 GMT -5
I have seen the letters. I have read everything on CCADP, your site, what was in the press, and anything else I could find. It all points to the trigger person as Richard Cartwright. That is the truth as I do see it. The letters from Overstreet do not prove anything to me, just as they proved nothing to the prosecutor. It does not matter what he wrote because he is a convict and would turn in his own mother for favors and candy... Believe what you will, but you are delusional... OMG, Mike, I can't believe you said that about him turning in his mother and all. I'm very ashamed now. You didn't know him. His mother was everything to him. You obviously haven't read about him, otherwise, you would know how he feels about his mother and you would have never said that.
|
|
|
Post by tinachurch on Jul 18, 2005 9:52:17 GMT -5
You don't know the facts!!! I do. Rich was innocent. End of story.
Tina
|
|
|
Post by sclcookie on Jul 18, 2005 9:52:22 GMT -5
Please read Pauls and his uncensoreds. You will know him if you read them. He is so honest in his articles. Please read them.
Also, have you read his memorial site with all the condolenses. Several prisoners on dr sent in their respects for him If he was honest, he wouldn't have earned as much respect as his fellow prisoners had for him.
|
|
|
Post by tinachurch on Jul 18, 2005 9:55:12 GMT -5
Suzanne, I will not share any privledge information. Their thoughts are not important to any of us. We all know the truth. Rich was a wonderful person. And we all know that he will live on forever! Irene and Riccki--you guys are loved and respected. love you both Tina
|
|
|
Post by sclcookie on Jul 18, 2005 9:58:57 GMT -5
Thank you so much, Tina. I appreciate it. It'll just give them more to argue against. If the truth was right in front of them, they'd still say he's guilty to keep the death penalty.
hugggz, Suzanne
|
|
|
Post by mikebook on Jul 18, 2005 9:59:09 GMT -5
I have read all of that. I have read all three incarnations of "Uncensored", the Guest book for about 5 pages, and everything that is on the web. It seems to me that you are saying this thing, that he is innocent, but you are not looking. Then you will not post stuff that will let me see things from your side. I have read what you post. I honestly have. But I do not see where you are claiming innocence. I do not see it. And do not tell me I need to get my eyes checked...I wear glasses and have just got a new pair so I see everything.....
|
|
|
Post by sclcookie on Jul 18, 2005 10:00:55 GMT -5
I've already explained his innocense. It's been a waste of time. Tina has explained. She is the expert on his case. It's still been a wast of time.
Rich is innocent and you will never change that.
hugggz, Suzanne
|
|
|
Post by mikebook on Jul 18, 2005 10:01:26 GMT -5
I was refering to Overstreet and his mother...Not Irene...Need to read a little better... (Note to self: Maybe I do need that English Lit course in the Fall more than I thought)
|
|