Mo-DAWG
Settlin' In
Yes... this is the real Mo-DAWG ..
Posts: 47
|
Post by Mo-DAWG on Aug 19, 2005 14:42:41 GMT -5
10000000% agreed Mo-Dawg (my point exactly) i´m falling into the same category too now...hahaha...no kidding... i usually avoid cases with children involved like devil avoids holy water...but damn..now i will read all i can grab about this case... i wanna find out what this is all about ... Mo-DAWG
|
|
|
Post by amyjason1 on Aug 23, 2005 17:44:04 GMT -5
The Rochas were steered in the wrong direction from the very start. It is a shame that the family became so divided. They had NO right under any circumstances to take things from Scott and Laci's home. With or without the police's consent. That was for Scott to decide which I'm pretty sure if they had just asked him he would have complied with compassion as he did for the police investigations. Never did I hear that he didn't cooperate with the police and the investigations. They hounded the poor man and ran him out of his own home. Just my thoughts on this topic. AMY Z.
|
|
|
Post by barrykopff on Aug 27, 2005 18:14:57 GMT -5
Why? because the CCADP is misguided, not that they do not have a legitimate gripe about the U S death penalty, they use a high profile murder case such as Scott Peterson's to get attention to their cause. Problem is the majority of U S citizens, who would have sat on the Scott Peterson jury, would not have voted to send Scott Peterson to death row they would have voted to sentence him to life in prison. Scott Peterson is GUILTY. Examine the evidence people! This guy is a sociopathic MURDERER. He showed no emotion ever for his missing then dead spouse or child after December 24,2002. He wanted them out of the way and he did not want the responsibility of a newborn child. Talk to or read the detectives notes from Modesto, CA who investigated Laci Peterson's disappearence, whoever were to do so could never dispute that Scott is a murderer. I, myself, a U S citizen am NOT a proponent of our death penalty however, I have read several accounts of this case; some for and some against Scott Peterson. I have overwhelmingly concluded based on the evidence that Scott is guilty. You CCADP people seem to have forgotten that a violent act was committed against a woman. Statistics show that the majority of violent acts committed against a woman in the U S are perpatrated by a spouse of boyfriend. I do not know your statistics in Canada that fall into the violence against woman category but I sure hope that you are sensitive & aware of the violent crimes committed against women everywhere. You and I,CCADP,can find a common ground in opposing the death penalty however, examine a case individually before you decide to make it your cause "de jour". If no one, except his family & you, is advocating for this guy's release from prison (remember many U S citizens are not monsters) than you need to carefully re-examine who you throw your support behind.
|
|
|
Post by CCADP on Aug 27, 2005 20:19:44 GMT -5
..."than you need to carefully re-examine who you throw your support behind."
THESE are the people CCADP throws 'support behind' and always will :
Anyone sentenced to death anywhere in the world who asks for our help.
So; as long as Scott Peterson; or anyone else; fits into that category; they will get what help we are able to provide - a free website to get their unfiltered words out to the world. We are not looking for a 'poster boy' or someone the world sees as sympathetic. We are simply here to help all those sentence to death.
Its a fairly simple mandate.
|
|
|
Post by sclcookie on Aug 28, 2005 1:40:48 GMT -5
I don't mind and see a need for a coalition to do this work, but I really resent the fact that you don't at least dicriminate between someone who is guilty and innocent. This guy had the best attorneys money could buy, the support of a loving family, and ample opportunities to show the public that he was telling the truth. Sadly this could not be accomplished because all he did was tell lies and I am sorry, but I am not interested in seeing this man go free. Life in prison, if that is what you are after for him, is fine by me, but I take issue with the fact that this is set up like a call for freedom. It's just not right. I am sorry to hear that Laci and her child do not happen to fall in your beloved category, but I assure you they are within the confines of mine. We don't discriminate against any DR inmates. We don't want any executed. People talk about DR inmates claiming innocense until they are executed. Truth is, how can you blame them, whether guilty or not. No one wants to die. We don't care if they are innocent or guilty. If they claim innocense, but really aren't then so be it. I will tell you this however, anyone I say is innocent, I know in my heart and soul that they are. Supporters (no, I'm not referring to groupies or fans) know the cases enough I they are saying the inmate is they support is innocent, it's because of the research they have done on said case. I think Scott is guilty, however, I'm not one of his supporters and I don't know enough of the case. The transcript is rather long and I haven't looked at it in weeks. I haven't even gone through 1% of the transcript, that's how long it is. Therefore, my opinion is not educated for sure. However, whether I believe Scott is guilty or not, he deserves my fight for his life, and I will do that. And as stated before, the reason he has his own area is because subjects on him was taking up too much of the forum where the other inmates we fight were put way in the back, so to make it fair to them, we had to make a new area soley for Scott. And it's not CCADP's fault that Scott's case is so high profile. And there is nothing wrong with wanting media attention for our cause. We DO want more of the public to be aware of the death penalty and many people DON'T pay attn. to it unless it's on the news, sooooooo, it's a good thing. When Shield's wrote that letter to the Gov. of Texas, he did it for us anti-dp activists and the other inmates on DR. It made the papers! We got media attn. Something we set out for. Thank you Robert Shields, his family, friends and supporters!!!!
|
|
|
Post by wyldflowers on Aug 28, 2005 1:53:23 GMT -5
I myself am not sure why ppl feel Scott is innocent.
Were any of you there? Ohhh heck no!
He was caught in a web of lies from day one.
Put aside Amber for a minute. (she only put the icing on the cake)
During the time that Scott could of been putting all his energy into finding his wife, He lied the very first day, claiming to be off golfing, (he was caught in that lie) and he was off selling Laci's jewelry on EBay, he then went within a weeks time and traded off her Car.
Consider this:
If you thought your spouse was *ONLY* missing: Would you seriously say that you would go and sell off their jewelry?
If you thought your spouse was *ONLY* missing: Would you get rid of her Car?
If you thought your spouse was *ONLY* missing: Would you make more of an effort to contact a *girlfriend*
Even when he was getting the popular support from both sides of the family.... Headquarters that was set up to find Laci was more interested in finding Laci, then Scott was!!! Ask your self why that is?
If you thought your spouse was ONLY Missing: Would you lie about your location? France? Eiffel Tower? New Years Eve Party? Give me a break! Cell phone records proved him a liar.
HOW many times in the short time he was married to Laci, did he have affairs, on the side?
Scott was convicted!!!
He is a man that cant tell the truth about anything. He is only *SORRY* that he was caught in one lie after another.
He was running when he was caught. You ppl forget that fact? An innocent person doesn't run unless he has something to run from.
Anyone knows a bad bleach job!! And Mommy Dearest tried to help her little boy evaded the Law. Enough so to collect money for him, a car for him, and an exit for him.
Scott got caught with his paws in the cookie jar.
Where is the Thread for those that feel Scott is getting what he deserves? Where is the fairness in these Website Threads for those of us that feel he got exactly what he deserved? (funny all those posts are conveniently deleted)
How many of you ppl have forgotten, that two lives were lost that December Day. I don't see a Thread started sending love and sympathy to the Rocha Family! Why is that? Cus they happen to disagree with you?
I have no clue if Scott murdered his wife or son... neither do YOU. Scott KNOWS what he did.... WE don't
All i know is, This man has never proven that "he can tell the truth". And i think thats why he was found guilty! Based on his trail of lies.
Retrial? If that ever happens, which i have serious doubt. I'm sure he will be exactly where he is today, On Death Row.
My sympathy goes to the Peterson Family, as well as the Rocha Family, both sets of Parents on both sides have all SUFFERED enough.
|
|
|
Post by sclcookie on Aug 28, 2005 2:00:20 GMT -5
I myself am not sure why ppl feel Scott is innocent. Were any of you there? Ohhh heck no! He was caught in a web of lies from day one. Put aside Amber for a minute. (she only put the icing on the cake) During the time that Scott could of been putting all his energy into finding his wife, He lied the very first day, claiming to be off golfing, (he was caught in that lie) and he was off selling Laci's jewelry on EBay, he then went within a weeks time and traded off her Car. Consider this: If you thought your spouse was *ONLY* missing: Would you seriously say that you would go and sell off their jewelry? If you thought your spouse was *ONLY* missing: Would you get rid of her Car? If you thought your spouse was *ONLY* missing: Would you make more of an effort to contact a *girlfriend* Even when he was getting the popular support from both sides of the family.... Headquarters that was set up to find Laci was more interested in finding Laci, then Scott was!!! Ask your self why that is? If you thought your spouse was ONLY Missing: Would you lie about your location? France? Eiffel Tower? New Years Eve Party? Give me a break! Cell phone records proved him a liar. HOW many times in the short time he was married to Laci, did he have affairs, on the side? Scott was convicted!!! He is a man that cant tell the truth about anything. He is only *SORRY* that he was caught in one lie after another. He was running when he was caught. You ppl forget that fact? An innocent person doesn't run unless he has something to run from. Anyone knows a bad bleach job!! And Mommy Dearest tried to help her little boy evaded the Law. Enough so to collect money for him, a car for him, and an exit for him. Scott got caught with his paws in the cookie jar. Where is the Thread for those that feel Scott is getting what he deserves? Where is the fairness in these Website Threads for those of us that feel he got exactly what he deserved? (funny all those posts are conveniently deleted) How many of you ppl have forgotten, that two lives were lost that December Day. I don't see a Thread started sending love and sympathy to the Rocha Family! Why is that? Cus they happen to disagree with you? I have no clue if Scott murdered his wife or son... neither do YOU. Scott KNOWS what he did.... WE don't All i know is, This man has never proven that "he can tell the truth". And i think thats why he was found guilty! Based on his trail of lies. Retrial? If that ever happens, which i have serious doubt. I'm sure he will be exactly where he is today, On Death Row. My sympathy goes to the Peterson Family, as well as the Rocha Family, both sets of Parents on both sides have all SUFFERED enough. As I've said before, I think he's guilty, however, just reading what I have of the transcript, there is a lot the media left out. That's just from reading less then 1% of the transcript. Scott's supporters are much more educated about his case than we are. They've investigated areas that's not in the media, including internet, news, etc.....if you base your opinion on media, then you probably need to learn more what the media does to cases. They tend to make someone seem guilty prior to their trials.
|
|
|
Post by sclcookie on Aug 28, 2005 2:02:49 GMT -5
yeah, but that post will soon be edited because it's disrespectful to the board. We don't mind debates, however, claiming that CCADP discriminates is disrespectful.
Coming in here to put us down for what we stand for is not tolerated. You may come in here for respectful debates.
Please see truth1's, dio's, rain's and other pros posts so you'll have a better understanding of what is allowed.
We are an anti board and pros are our guests.
|
|
|
Post by wyldflowers on Aug 28, 2005 2:11:06 GMT -5
sclcookie,
Respectfully, I was born and raised in Modesto. I didnt go to the same School as Scott or Laci... But i saw all this unfold before my eyes, daily.
I went to THEIR home and laid flowers. I went and passed out flyers to help find Laci. I met Scott, I met the Roche's and Peterson Families.
Scott was always off to the side lines on his cell phone, so much so, that ppl serious were upset that he was more interested in his cell-phone, then he was looking for his wife.
I saw what this did to *MY* Home town. I know first hand, you cant blame Media on what ppl here in Modesto saw. You cant possilbly know the work effort put into effect to find Laci.
Everyone has the right to their opinion....reguardless if you agree with it or not, its only fair that both sides have a chance to express themselves.
And I would like to see a Thread started in Support of the Roche family... The Petersons have theirs.... why not make it a fair site for all to express themselves?
|
|
|
Post by sclcookie on Aug 28, 2005 2:23:57 GMT -5
sclcookie, Respectfully, I was born and raised in Modesto. I didnt go to the same School as Scott or Laci... But i saw all this unfold before my eyes, daily. I went to THEIR home and laid flowers. I went and passed out flyers to help find Laci. I met Scott, I met the Roche's and Peterson Families. Scott was always off to the side lines on his cell phone, so much so, that ppl serious were upset that he was more interested in his cell-phone, then he was looking for his wife. I saw what this did to *MY* Home town. I know first hand, you cant blame Media on what ppl here in Modesto saw. You cant possilbly know the work effort put into effect to find Laci. Everyone has the right to their opinion....reguardless if you agree with it or not, its only fair that both sides have a chance to express themselves. And I would like to see a Thread started in Support of the Roche family... The Petersons have theirs.... why not make it a fair site for all to express themselves? There is a victims area if you would like to start a thread. Your debates are very welcome and think you for posting your knowledge on the case. In fact, if you would like to refer people to said thread you can add it to your signature area and I'd be glad to help you with such. hugggz, Suzanne p.s. Here is the thread to said victims area: ccadp.proboards40.com/index.cgi?board=victimsAlso, I would like to point out there are several links in the victims area if your looking for MVS support sites. Plus if you know of any, you may add links, including Lacy and Conner links.
|
|
|
Post by Maggie on Aug 28, 2005 8:25:32 GMT -5
sclcookie, Respectfully, I was born and raised in Modesto. I didnt go to the same School as Scott or Laci... But i saw all this unfold before my eyes, daily. I went to THEIR home and laid flowers. I went and passed out flyers to help find Laci. I met Scott, I met the Roche's and Peterson Families. Scott was always off to the side lines on his cell phone, so much so, that ppl serious were upset that he was more interested in his cell-phone, then he was looking for his wife. I saw what this did to *MY* Home town. I know first hand, you cant blame Media on what ppl here in Modesto saw. You cant possilbly know the work effort put into effect to find Laci. Everyone has the right to their opinion....reguardless if you agree with it or not, its only fair that both sides have a chance to express themselves. And I would like to see a Thread started in Support of the Roche family... The Petersons have theirs.... why not make it a fair site for all to express themselves? Hey since you live in Modesto.... any word on the Home Invasion gangs that terrorized the area for.... what was it.... a two year span? I'm especially interested in David Anthony Silva and his little crew. Also, any recent reporting on Steve Todd? My I'm amazed that he stole the Medina safe with just one other person aren't you? I heard it took five cops to recover it. The list of items stolen from their home was massive.... and there was Steve Todd with a honda and a bike. I wonder how he did that don't you?? What I really wonder about though is how he avoided LIFE in prison under CA's three strike law? I guess the DA was in a good mood when he gave Todd that plea, I bet Todd was really relieved. Hey do you know anything about the Tenbrink brothers?? Adam and Shawn.... according to at least one corrections officer they seemed to have info that Todd threatened Laci on the day of her disappearance-- the MPD "lost" the tape.... they seem to lose a lot of things. Your detective Brocchini seems to have the same problem, excising things from witness reports, adding things that weren't said. Maybe he gets brain fog... like that day he swore under oath Scott lied about the merange on the Martha Stewart show..... damn if Scott wasn't 100% right. Oh, but wait.... you saw Scott on his cell phone!! OMG!! How dare he!!! He must be a killer!!!
|
|
|
Post by CCADP on Aug 28, 2005 8:46:56 GMT -5
Maggie and I and all the members of this board waiting patiently for these important Modesto updates
|
|
|
Post by dio on Aug 28, 2005 14:56:13 GMT -5
I myself am not sure why ppl feel Scott is innocent. Were any of you there? Ohhh heck no! He was caught in a web of lies from day one. Put aside Amber for a minute. (she only put the icing on the cake) During the time that Scott could of been putting all his energy into finding his wife, He lied the very first day, claiming to be off golfing, (he was caught in that lie) and he was off selling Laci's jewelry on EBay, he then went within a weeks time and traded off her Car. Consider this: If you thought your spouse was *ONLY* missing: Would you seriously say that you would go and sell off their jewelry? If you thought your spouse was *ONLY* missing: Would you get rid of her Car? If you thought your spouse was *ONLY* missing: Would you make more of an effort to contact a *girlfriend* Even when he was getting the popular support from both sides of the family.... Headquarters that was set up to find Laci was more interested in finding Laci, then Scott was!!! Ask your self why that is? If you thought your spouse was ONLY Missing: Would you lie about your location? France? Eiffel Tower? New Years Eve Party? Give me a break! Cell phone records proved him a liar. HOW many times in the short time he was married to Laci, did he have affairs, on the side? Scott was convicted!!! He is a man that cant tell the truth about anything. He is only *SORRY* that he was caught in one lie after another. He was running when he was caught. You ppl forget that fact? An innocent person doesn't run unless he has something to run from. Anyone knows a bad bleach job!! And Mommy Dearest tried to help her little boy evaded the Law. Enough so to collect money for him, a car for him, and an exit for him. Scott got caught with his paws in the cookie jar. Where is the Thread for those that feel Scott is getting what he deserves? Where is the fairness in these Website Threads for those of us that feel he got exactly what he deserved? (funny all those posts are conveniently deleted) How many of you ppl have forgotten, that two lives were lost that December Day. I don't see a Thread started sending love and sympathy to the Rocha Family! Why is that? Cus they happen to disagree with you? I have no clue if Scott murdered his wife or son... neither do YOU. Scott KNOWS what he did.... WE don't All i know is, This man has never proven that "he can tell the truth". And i think thats why he was found guilty! Based on his trail of lies. Retrial? If that ever happens, which i have serious doubt. I'm sure he will be exactly where he is today, On Death Row. My sympathy goes to the Peterson Family, as well as the Rocha Family, both sets of Parents on both sides have all SUFFERED enough. Excellent post Wyld.The various points you put forth for consideration clearly exhibit the actions of a GUILTY party.I find it sad that a pretty boy image can make so many forget that behind the pretty face lies a child killer,not to mention a wife killer.You are also correct that based upon his own actions any future jury would need an IQ of 1 to find any differently than the original has...Enjoy your time Scottie2Hottie
|
|
|
Post by sclcookie on Aug 28, 2005 15:02:29 GMT -5
yeah, but that post will soon be edited because it's disrespectful to the board. We don't mind debates, however, claiming that CCADP discriminates is disrespectful. Coming in here to put us down for what we stand for is not tolerated. You may come in here for respectful debates. Please see truth1's, dio's, rain's and other pros posts so you'll have a better understanding of what is allowed. We are an anti board and pros are our guests. Scott Peterson is wonderful. He is innocent! I am a supporter of this CCADP forum! Scott, your a hottie! See, now, dio is completely respectful. He believes Scott is guilty and so do I, however, he wasn't disrespectful to Scott's supportor nor to CCADP. Now if you begin to respect the board, I won't modify your posts anymore. I don't delete....that's no fun....and banning isn't fun either. Plus, I'll quit making you say scott is a hottie .
|
|
|
Post by dio on Aug 28, 2005 15:08:17 GMT -5
thank you.I'm unsure if Wyld is a supporter tho,based on the post I replied to I think she might be a tad on the pro side......
|
|