|
|
Post by sclcookie on Aug 30, 2005 7:57:15 GMT -5
Credibility doesn't necessarily mean that you're liked. I'm disliked by many because of what I stant for and for helping inforce the rules of this board.
What I mean by what I stand for is against the death penalty. It's not very popular here in the State of Texas.
As far as enforcing the rules, people come in here, assuming because it's a public board they can post anything they want and they get offended when they are reminded that this is an anti board and a support board for dr inmates and their families. It is a previlege to have a debate area to debate inmates cases. Not all anti boards allow that. So....of coarse, I'm not so popular in that area.
However, as far as credibility is concerned, I've definately gained it, whether or not I'm liked for it. It comes with the territory.
|
|
|
|
Post by mhdubuha on Aug 30, 2005 12:37:46 GMT -5
sclcookie-
Why do you say that? You are not disliked on this board at all... as a matter of fact most of what I read here is all about respect for you. I know we got off to a rocky start, but things are lookin' up babe!!!
Warden-
Then you understand why this was so heart wretching for me. You know what it feels like to want to protect that life and what it means if you fail. That is why I am sooooooo interested in this, if that could happen to Laci, it could happen to ANYONE and not just b/c she is white and pretty and all that. More b/c of what Scott was "the Golden Boy" "MR. Charmer" It's just horrible...
Wyld-
Everytime I read one of your posts I get more and more convinced that we are kindered spirits... YOU ROCK!!!!
~MH
|
|
|
|
Post by wyldflowers on Aug 30, 2005 18:08:45 GMT -5
sclcookie, I don't know you from adam on these threads. But i can say from what i have read, you speak from the heart, and i admire that from anyone, regardless if i agree or disagree with them. I happen to think your pretty cool, don't change who you are, I'm not in your position of monitoring these threads, but i can tell you from my prospective, your extremely fair in your comments.... Stay Strong!  |
|
|
|
Post by wyldflowers on Aug 31, 2005 0:28:44 GMT -5
Do you suppose that juries are ever really told what probability to associate to the phrase `reasonable doubt'?
How well is it explained to those faced with that term, for the first time? How well would you do on any jury when asked to decide someones fate?
Things to think about.
Below is what i grabbed off Google:
REASONABLE DOUBT - The level of certainty a juror must have to find a defendant guilty of a crime. A real doubt, based upon reason and common sense after careful and impartial consideration of all the evidence, or lack of evidence, in a case.
Proof beyond a reasonable doubt, therefore, is proof of such a convincing character that you would be willing to rely and act upon it without hesitation in the most important of your own affairs. However, it does not mean an absolute certainty.
~wyld
|
|
|
|
Post by mhdubuha on Aug 31, 2005 0:33:10 GMT -5
And wyld takes the cake once more... Always on point, Always on time!
|
|
|
|
Post by wyldflowers on Sept 1, 2005 0:29:31 GMT -5
mhdubuha Hahahaaa....  |
|
|
|
Post by Maggie on Sept 4, 2005 7:44:10 GMT -5
Nah Mh your not alone,there are a few of us pros here.And in all fact most of the antis here are not looking to release the Petersens of the nation,they just don't want them executed.As long as we respect their opinions they return the favor. Thank you Wylde....I have to be honest and say I date a poet so I am bombarded with touchy llines like that all the time....LOLOf coarse I also get bombed with lines like take out the bloody trash,Crikey are ya going to sleep all day etc etc....She might be a poet but she was a female first.......LMAO LOL |
|
|
|
Post by mhdubuha on Sept 4, 2005 23:41:43 GMT -5
mhdubuha, Next time you logon... grab my email... Did you get my pm? I sent mine through there. Let me know or pm me yours so's that we's can chat |
|
|
|
Post by mhdubuha on Sept 5, 2005 13:46:17 GMT -5
Done check your inbox
|
|
|
|
Post by californiabound on Sept 8, 2005 12:49:59 GMT -5
The Rochas believe Scott did it because they know him personally. They know he did it. Sharon Rocha does not seem like the type of person who could be brain washed, if she believed he didn't do it then she would have defended him like a lioness protecting its cub. He was her son in law and Connor's father, Laci's husband, he was family and she trusted him - but he wasn't clever enough to pull the wool over her eyes. A mother knows.
|
|
|
|
Post by mhdubuha on Sept 9, 2005 12:41:40 GMT -5
The Rochas believe Scott did it because they know him personally. They know he did it. Sharon Rocha does not seem like the type of person who could be brain washed, if she believed he didn't do it then she would have defended him like a lioness protecting its cub. He was her son in law and Connor's father, Laci's husband, he was family and she trusted him - but he wasn't clever enough to pull the wool over her eyes. A mother knows. That's exactly right. Mother's have intuition when it comes to their babies. It's a fact and she is a very strong person, it would be hard to convince her of something she didn't feel in her heart. Btw, this isn't something that I will debate, we have all seen how strong this women is. |
|
|
|
Post by moghirl on Sept 9, 2005 16:44:19 GMT -5
The Rochas believe Scott did it because they know him personally. They know he did it. Sharon Rocha does not seem like the type of person who could be brain washed, if she believed he didn't do it then she would have defended him like a lioness protecting its cub. He was her son in law and Connor's father, Laci's husband, he was family and she trusted him - but he wasn't clever enough to pull the wool over her eyes. A mother knows. That's exactly right. Mother's have intuition when it comes to their babies. It's a fact and she is a very strong person, it would be hard to convince her of something she didn't feel in her heart. Btw, this isn't something that I will debate, we have all seen how strong this women is. OK, if a mothers knows intuitively, then Jackie P believes her son didn't do this and therefore she's supporting him. Can someone' pull the wool 'over the eyes of their own mother/parents? I know you don't want to debate this mhdubuha, it's jmo. |
|
