|
Post by Maggie on Aug 24, 2006 15:43:22 GMT -5
MX41 has been posting on multiple forums with his challenge response, including CTV and the Modesto Bee forum.
For those that want to know the games he playes... do a search for all the posts here by "Artguy"
Yes, it IS one and the same person.
I could post the trail that busted him with no doubt whatsoever, but I won't for privacy issues (YET)
When assessing someone's credibility, you have to ask.... what kind of person does this kind of stuff?
A lying weirdo! But hey..... this is cyber space. Be careful.
|
|
|
Post by Maggie on Aug 24, 2006 14:49:36 GMT -5
It has been brought to my attention that the person who attempted to disrupt this forum by posting their response to the Peterson challenge-- which was filled with misinformation, is ALSO a person who posted on this forum in support of Scott and even claimed to have written letters to people in government in support of Scott. He claimed he was an ex attorney, which he was not, and manipulated supporters, for a weird and sick agenda.
The poster Artguy, is ALSO the poster Mx41, who was banned for harassment.
Some of you may remember "Artguy" posting here recently claiming he "read" the response to the challenge, and thus changed his mind about Scott's innocence. I let the thread stand for a day or so, and then deleted it. Back then I became suspicious. Now I have confirmation. They are one and the same. No doubt about it.
Why somebody would feel the need to spend so much time cultivating a false online identity, just to further a sick agenda with Scott, desperate to prove his guilt, is beyond me. His response to the challenge.... ALL attempts, are filled with misinformation. It is truly sad.
Maggie
|
|
|
Post by Maggie on Aug 30, 2006 15:10:19 GMT -5
HH I don't know much about his other cases.... but I was disappointed in his CIC. However.... if the jury hadn't been media brainwashed, idiots and looking for a book deal, then the verdict should have been NOT GUILTY, even without a defense. The prosecution proved NOTHING. This case was a travesty on so many levels. It showed the standard of proof in this country has dropped to a dangerously low level. When NOTHING gets the death penalty, that's pretty scary.
|
|
|
Post by Maggie on Aug 30, 2006 8:36:45 GMT -5
LB,
Here, when the death penalty is on the table, ALL jurors must be in favor of the death penalty. If you say you are against the death penalty, you are immediately let go. A "death qualified" jury means that every person on that jury is PRO DEATH PENALTY.
Shocking isn't it?
Studies have shown that a death qualified jury is more likely to convict. Somehow that doesn't surprise me as imo these people are more run by an emotional blood thirst for revenge than an objective observation of the facts.
eta- I bumped an older thread for you in the debate section on death qualified juries.
|
|
|
Post by Maggie on Aug 30, 2006 7:24:07 GMT -5
Hi Yvonnepar--
I too found Dalton's book very interesting. I don't know why Geragos didn't call the many witnesses who saw Laci walking. He did a good job on cross examination to bring the info out from police reports and interviews.... but I wish he would have called some of them in his CIC- many people were disappointed he did not, imo. Dalton seemed like a good investigator to me, and also passionate about the case. I wish he had stayed on the team... oh well... you know what they say about hindsight.
I agree with you on Scott's case-- no evidence.... at all, actually. Consider that if our justice system can be so flawed, there should be no death penalty. You can see how it is applied. It is a myth that it is only applied to the worst with proof. There are other reasons that I do not agree with the death penalty, but cases like Scott's (and many others-- ) alone is enough to abolish the DP imo.
I often wonder if a NON "death qualified" jury would have found Scott guilty? It's been shown over and over again that death qualified juries favor the prosecution big time. I have issues with that as well.
|
|
|
Post by Maggie on Jul 28, 2006 12:19:57 GMT -5
The idiot is gone.
Don't worry about it you guys..... that kind of stuff is not tolerated here-- period.
|
|
|
Post by Maggie on Jul 22, 2006 17:39:48 GMT -5
I agree. The "reporting" in the Modesto Bee is biased, not to mention.... just plain .... bad. I doubt Garth will ever do anything beyond the Modesto Bee
|
|
|
Post by Maggie on Jul 22, 2006 17:35:19 GMT -5
I think he has a good point too.
I've been calling it brainwashing by way of the media and lies, but maybe the psychology behind it goes deeper than that.
Scott Peterson sits on death row with absolutely NO EVIDENCE what-so-ever that he killed his wife. (In fact, imo, the known facts point to his innocence)..... yet once the media and LE decided to demonize him with the PC of opportunist Frey, it was all over. I've always been disgusted with the hypocrisy of this, as we all know millions of people cheat, and often way worse than Scott Peterson.
|
|
|
Post by Maggie on Jul 21, 2006 15:37:16 GMT -5
(It looks like they have professional police officeers at work here. Aren't they lucky this isn't the Keystone cops from Modesto?) Boy HH you aren't kidding, I thought the same thing when I read this from the article: Sheriff Ronnie Strength politely asked Augusta reporters not to turn the matter into a Laci Peterson affair. He said the woman's husband, Bernard Dunstan III, has never been a target of the investigation.Good to know we still have some honest cops out there. I think his statement is telling in how he might have viewed Brocchini and company. I'll be hoping for a positive outcome in this case.
|
|
|
Post by Maggie on Jul 22, 2006 12:56:05 GMT -5
You were in communication with Anne Byrd? Was it just through this website, or did you meet face to face? Have you met Scott before? Wow, that's cool! Actually, there is nothing cool about this case. It's tragic on multiple levels. Nothing can bring Laci and Conner back, but the travesty of justice concerning Scott needs to be corrected. Not just for him, but for all of us. What happened to Scott, could happen to any of us if police departments and DA's and the ratings driven media are allowed to get away with the crap that went on in this case. I have not met Scott personally. I don't need to meet him to see the obvious miscarriage of justice here. This isn't just about Scott... it's about our justice system that is in need of serious reform, imo.
|
|
|
Post by Maggie on Jul 22, 2006 7:38:41 GMT -5
Did she email you Maggie? If so, I hope you still have those emails. ;D Scott's lawyers have them too. Like I said, she will never be an issue, except for the personal hurt she inflicted on the Peterson family-- for money-- she will have to live with that.
|
|
|
Post by Maggie on Jul 22, 2006 7:30:48 GMT -5
Stephanie,
Anne Bird is a big liar who sold out for money. She supported Scott until the guilty verdict, then sold out for money. I was in communication with Anne during the trial, and she was nothing but supportive, talking about how brainwashed people were who thought Scott was guilty. She had nothing but good things to say about him. Keep in mind this was during the trial, so the so called "strange behavior" she wrote about in her book had already taken place long ago. Funny how that behavior didn't seem strange to her until she saw her chance to make some $$$$.
Anne has no credibility and Scott's lawyers have a ton of Anne's statements so she will never matter, except that she will be the resentlful half sister who sold out for money.
By the way, Scott and Laci never spent all that much time with Anne and her husband. Laci didn't like Anne's husband (not that I blame her)..... Anne's book is full of lies.
It doesn't surprise me one bit that Gloria Allred was her "lawyer"....
|
|
|
Post by Maggie on Jul 21, 2006 15:31:35 GMT -5
Gloria Allred is a mean spirited idiot, imo, disguised as a "victim's advocate".... my azz.... she is a witch.
During Scott's trial, I heard her say WITH MY OWN EARS that Conner could still have continued to grow in Laci after she was dead...... so that could account for his being FULL TERM.
I had to ask myself, how did this woman get through high school let alone law school??
By the way... I think it's Time Warner that owns CTV... (I think Dove asked on another thread)
|
|
|
Post by Maggie on Jul 21, 2006 6:54:52 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Maggie on Jul 18, 2006 15:40:02 GMT -5
Does anybody see anything disturbing about this?? I do. Why is the Modesto Bee taking pictures of the OLD (no longer owned by) Peterson home???!!! Why are articles being written about the sale??
Big freaking deal. The guy sold his house.
We all know there was no evidence in it WAY back when Scott and Laci lived there. Why would anybody want to see this new guy and his pics of what he's done?
The media is so invested in this case, it's bizarre!
|
|