|
Post by guest4life on Feb 23, 2007 22:54:05 GMT -5
Do you know what an enabler is? By defending behavior that hurt him, you are not supporting Scott, you are encouraging him to believe that the things that he said and did were correct and normal, just "different".
If he was just an everyday friend of yours who wasn't in prison but who had his values & priorities screwed up (girlfriend more important than wife & child who are in serious danger), you'd probably sit down and talk to that friend about setting himself straight and acting like a man.
Being on death row doesn't automatically make everything you ever did in your life right.
You are the one who turned it into an argument by making personal comments about me. I had made none about you.
Outta here.............bye
|
|
|
Post by guest4life on Feb 23, 2007 22:57:17 GMT -5
Okay, I'll leave, but I didn't put any words into your mouth. You said that Scott wanted a friend who believed him, and I said that he had friends & family who believed him, but he kept talking to Amber, who DIDN'T believe him. But no one seems to have a theory on why it was so important to him that Amber believe him and be his friend. He had other people who believed him AND who loved him to talk to. It just doesn't make sense why he would take a polygraph for Amber, but not take a private one to try to clear himself. It was more important to him to prove himself to one person, when his life was at stake and that one person's opinion meant nothing when it came to whether or not Scott would be arrested and tried. I realize that your philosophy is that if someone is innocent, you can't admit that they did ANYTHING wrong or made ANY mistakes, and that anyone who doesn't defend 100% of what that person did or said gets chased off to somewhere like fratpack. Thanks for chasing me off. That will help Scott. I'm not defending everything Scott did. I'm just saying that everyone reacts differently when faced with a crisis. And you don't have to leave, I just didn't like how you seemed to be putting words into my mouth. Except that I didn't put any words into your mouth. Actually, you did that to me by saying that I said something about Scott wanting to have sex with Amber.
|
|
|
Post by guest4life on Feb 23, 2007 23:55:15 GMT -5
He wasn't romancing her with sex talk, he was romancing her with romantic poetry and talk about raising her daughter with her and them "taking care of each other", and leaving jewelry and romantic CDs in the bushes for her. In any universe, that would be called "romancing". I didn't lie. He did that.
Never once did I say that I believe Scott is guilty, or that I wanted anyone to believe he was.
And never once did I mention guilt based on his affair and behavior. You have said that, and you have a lot of nerve saying that I said it!
You have a bad habit of putting words into other people's mouth and then saying that that's what they're doing to you - when it's actually the other way around.
And now you're calling me names.
On the one hand, you talk about the idea of everyone reacting to things differently.
On the other hand, no one is allowed to discuss anything unless they say exactly the same thing that everyone else does, thinks was everyone else does, says what everyone else does.
No one here is allowed to even have an opinion on pre- or post- alleged crime behavior.
And now you've reported me to the moderators so that it will stay that way, and so that no one will be able to say ONE WORD that you don't agree with.
I was talking about the TOPIC, and YOU were the one who started talking about ME.
No wonder it's only the same couple of people posting here week after week, year after year.
You chase everyone else away if they're not a member of your little "club".
|
|
|
Post by Maggie on Feb 27, 2007 8:36:28 GMT -5
No one here is allowed to even have an opinion on pre- or post- alleged crime behavior. And now you've reported me to the moderators so that it will stay that way, and so that no one will be able to say ONE WORD that you don't agree with. I was talking about the TOPIC, and YOU were the one who started talking about ME. No wonder it's only the same couple of people posting here week after week, year after year. You chase everyone else away if they're not a member of your little "club". I get busy for awhile and people forget the rules around here. This is a SUPPORT FORUM. You need to get that into your head. This is not a platform for you or anyone else to protest the support for Scott Peterson. We are done arguing with people who think he is guilty and we are looking to the appeals process to correct this travesty of justice. By the way, the support for Scott Peterson is no "small club". He has literally thousands of supporters-- that is fact, and no, I don't have a link. If you do not fall into that catagory then do not post in this section. Anyone who violates this rule will be banned. Consider this your one and only warning. Thank you.
|
|
|
Post by guest4life on Feb 28, 2007 10:07:43 GMT -5
I think that I deserve an explanation for that post.
I have never once protested the support here of Scott Peterson, and you have a lot of nerve putting words into my mouth.
I merely questioned some of his behavior, and how it may have made him look bad.
If you can't admit that some of the things he did and said were not in his best interest, then you are not actually supporting him.
If you have ever read any of the other prisoner webpages here, you'd know that most of them say things like, "I've made a lot of mistakes in my life". They know that, although they may be innocent of the crime they've been convicted of, their lifestyle and outlook did not help them.
If you can't admit that about Scott, also, you are just encouraging his mistakes.
Go ahead and ban me.
|
|
|
Post by pumpkinpie on Mar 1, 2007 14:42:57 GMT -5
If some friends of mine were to for some reason or other have a support group going on somewhere for me, and one person began listing my mistakes, trying to make me look bad, and saying nothing but negative things about me, then I wouldn't consider that person a member of the support group, I would consider them a basher of it. Scott is a considerate, kind person who has been known to go out of his way for others, and help people. He was never violent towards Laci or anyone, and has appeared to be a gentle and giving person.
|
|
|
Post by guest4life on Mar 2, 2007 10:35:10 GMT -5
If some friends of mine were to for some reason or other have a support group going on somewhere for me, and one person began listing my mistakes, trying to make me look bad, and saying nothing but negative things about me, then I wouldn't consider that person a member of the support group, I would consider them a basher of it. Scott is a considerate, kind person who has been known to go out of his way for others, and help people. He was never violent towards Laci or anyone, and has appeared to be a gentle and giving person. So I guess this means that you're not being "supportive" of your own children if you point it out to them when things they are doing and saying are not beneficial to themselves. If you admit that your child told a lie or cheated, and that this has or will cause them to not appear credible to other people, you are not being a supportive parent. For cripe's sake, even Scott's attorney admitted that he did things that weren't very nice. I'm sure there are many people who lurk here (even though there are very few who post). When you try to make Scott out to be a Saint, it must make people who are fence sitters wonder why you feel that you must cover for him - and deny any wrongdoing of his. You know he wasn't a Saint, and that he wasn't always honest. Why the need to pretend that he was?
|
|
|
Post by pumpkinpie on Mar 2, 2007 20:44:44 GMT -5
If some friends of mine were to for some reason or other have a support group going on somewhere for me, and one person began listing my mistakes, trying to make me look bad, and saying nothing but negative things about me, then I wouldn't consider that person a member of the support group, I would consider them a basher of it. Scott is a considerate, kind person who has been known to go out of his way for others, and help people. He was never violent towards Laci or anyone, and has appeared to be a gentle and giving person. So I guess this means that you're not being "supportive" of your own children if you point it out to them when things they are doing and saying are not beneficial to themselves. If you admit that your child told a lie or cheated, and that this has or will cause them to not appear credible to other people, you are not being a supportive parent. For cripe's sake, even Scott's attorney admitted that he did things that weren't very nice. I'm sure there are many people who lurk here (even though there are very few who post). When you try to make Scott out to be a Saint, it must make people who are fence sitters wonder why you feel that you must cover for him - and deny any wrongdoing of his. You know he wasn't a Saint, and that he wasn't always honest. Why the need to pretend that he was? The way I would speak to a child, and correct a child about honesty, is much different than the way I would speak to a grown man Scott's age. I wouldn't be lecturing or teaching life lessons about honesty to a guy that's older than me. Who here is calling Scott a saint? ( I don't think anyone here has. I listed Scott's good qualities, but never called him a saint.) Infidelity is wrong in any situation, but in no way does it tie itself to murder, or as you put it in one of your posts-alleged crime behavior. Nope, no connection between infidelity and murder.
|
|
|
Post by guest4life on Mar 2, 2007 22:07:15 GMT -5
You're saying that if a friend of yours is doing immoral things, you never talk to them about it - you just defend that behavior? Especially if that behavior had gotten them in big trouble?
I was talking about mistakes that he made (like, agree to take a LD test for Amber, as if she was more important than LE or Laci's family).
If you can't agree this is was a mistake, fine. I wasn't attacking you about it. It was you who was attacking me for daring to say it.
I was also saying that it's never too late to try to make amends, or to apologize for your mistakes.
You don't.
But I guess I'm not "allowed" to have an opinion here.
|
|
|
Post by Maggie on Mar 5, 2007 19:16:04 GMT -5
You are correct. Your opinion on Scott Peterson is no longer welcome here.
This person has been banned.
This is a SUPPORT forum. Anyone who doesn't understand that word needs to look it up in the dictionary. Debate Scott's case somewhere else. How much more clear can I be???
This section of the CCADP message board is for people who SUPPORT Scott Peterson.
Blatant bashing of any death row prisoner is not allowed anywhere on this site, as this entire site is designed to be supportive of friends and family members of those on death row.
|
|