|
Post by jay on Mar 11, 2006 5:19:20 GMT -5
eeek, the news is getting worse and worse for the pros isn't it.
It seems we will all be banned. Are you going to throw us out? Can we have some warning to say good bye to friends we've made?
|
|
|
Post by sclcookie on Mar 11, 2006 5:37:16 GMT -5
This is CCADP's board so they make the ultimate decisions, but I think we need more opinions first, esp. from those anti's who used to come in here on a regular basis and don't anymore......
Please, give us your opinions anti's.
hugggz, Suzanne
|
|
Mo-DAWG
Settlin' In
Yes... this is the real Mo-DAWG ..
Posts: 47
|
Post by Mo-DAWG on Mar 11, 2006 6:21:46 GMT -5
eeek, the news is getting worse and worse for the pros isn't it. It seems we will all be banned. Are you going to throw us out? Can we have some warning to say good bye to friends we've made? hi jay ... well i think its not a question of things getting worse but a question of the purpose of this board .. ccadp is a support board against cap.punishment and for dr inmates, their family and friends .. its never been created to discuss or question the dp .. even the debate area was actually created to debate issues referring to the dp with other antis ... last year at one point the decision was made to let pros in as well and in many cases this lead to a real chaos of personal insults and attacks .. more than often enough from both sides by the way .. instead of using our time to do what this board had been created for we wasted our time in senseless wars and discussions of a stance we wouldnt change anyways and we wouldnt change any pro stances anyways .. for me personally its not a mission or something .. a person can only change his stance himself .. others cant do it ...so i try to educate people who are interested in the dp and then they can decide for themselves whether they wanna be pro or anti .. or just sit on the fence .. .. i have no idea whats gonna happen to the pros at ccadp and its not my decision but i do hope they wont just be thrown out without being able to say good bye to the friends they made here .. it would just be a good bye on ccadp .. theres other boards that have been created for the purpose to bring pros and antis together in discussions questioning and discussing the dp one way or another .. again: this board wasnt ... its a support board against the dp and for dr inmates and their friends and families ... always Mo-DAWG
|
|
|
Post by judywaits4u on Mar 11, 2006 13:56:19 GMT -5
Dear Mo, If it was left to me, I would allow the pros that are already and trusted to stay but not give membership to new pros in future. THe problem is that unless the person says they are pro, how does anybody decide whether the people who want to join are pro?
Love and hugs, Judy
|
|
Mo-DAWG
Settlin' In
Yes... this is the real Mo-DAWG ..
Posts: 47
|
Post by Mo-DAWG on Mar 11, 2006 14:06:12 GMT -5
Dear Mo, If it was left to me, I would allow the pros that are already and trusted to stay but not give membership to new pros in future. THe problem is that unless the person says they are pro, how does anybody decide whether the people who want to join are pro? Love and hugs, Judy well i have no problems with those pros that are in already either ... and new membership ...oh lord ..good question .. i have no idea how to know whos pro and whos not... the problem was more like pros who wanna stir up trouble coming here cuz they couldnt stand what we are doing and thought they needed to vent .. as i said at norules already and here as well ... i have no problem with pros i just cant stand the pro trash that comes with them cuz those people are timewasters ... antis as well as pros know who im talking about i guess.. Mo-DAWG
|
|
|
Post by abiraballari on Mar 12, 2006 21:58:59 GMT -5
That pro site you refered to allows anti's, however, if you voice that you write a dr inmate, they curse you, call you "scum pal", etc., or argue your point, you will get banned. Esp. if you don't let up. I know that first hand. I DID go over there supporting Jaime Elizalde and I got the same response. Things like he got what he deserved and, suuuure he wasn't innocent, etc, etc. I gave up trying to be nice
|
|
|
Post by sclcookie on Mar 13, 2006 0:30:39 GMT -5
OK, well, why don't we just start referring pros who want to be in a forum with anti's to the norules board?
They are perfectly welcome there?
Maybe make this forum as pro free as possible? just an idea, anyway.
|
|
|
Post by sclcookie on Mar 23, 2006 2:44:58 GMT -5
found even more reasons to make this pro-free....
all you lurking anti's, please come vote.
And comment on why you voted the way you did.
The votes that aren't explained won't be counted.
hugggz, Suzanne
|
|
|
Post by distel on Mar 29, 2006 16:14:35 GMT -5
I voted yes because I didn't think of pros who come here to stir up trouble. To stop this there are already rules on this board, however I'm new here, and not very active. So I don't have to deal with them all the time like you who have been here longer and more regularly.
But I have had some discussions with Red and anna, who changes her screen name so often that I don't know if it's still her screen name ;-) and some of these discussions are just a lot of work that goes into them with no interesting results.
Others had interesting results and that's why I voted "yes" - but I think you should rather count the votes of people who keep this board going by being active here for a long time, because it's you who will live with the decision.
greetings
distel
|
|
|
Post by oztash on Mar 30, 2006 0:07:10 GMT -5
My 2 cents on the subject of pros being allowed on the ccadp board are. 1. None, should not be judged purely on wether they're pro/anti, should be a case by case bases. 2. Not all topics should be opened to all, this is a safety issue for a lot of anti's and they're pen pals, and the main reason I have been away from this board for so long. 3. All need to be warned by admins that disrespect, by anti/pro is not acceptable, maybe there should be 3 strike rule, but obviously this is a case by case issue, which depends on what ws said/done and the effect of such words actions.
This is just my 2 cents worth, and I hope my honest opinion helps, is food for thought. Hugs Natasha '
|
|
|
Post by sclcookie on Mar 30, 2006 0:29:24 GMT -5
Thank you oztash and distel, I appreciate your input. That's exactly what I'm looking for, that is explainations on why you think one way or the other, along with your history on this board.
hugggz, Suzanne
|
|
|
Post by attitude on Mar 30, 2006 0:56:57 GMT -5
I don't think you can analyse who is pro and who is anti at the time of registration...
Perhaps you should keep the main, other stuff, into and debate forum open access and restrict access to the others to people who you know..maybe you need to look in the grey areas
|
|