Post by yvonnepar on Apr 6, 2007 17:58:08 GMT -5
What I don't understand, is any judge who would review this case has to see that the trial was a farce from the onset. To bill "Amber" as the star witness was pathetic. She did nothing but prove he committed adultry and lied. What else did she have to offer? She had no evidence to offer, no confession...nothing. She wanted her 15 min of fame and got it. Next, couldn't any judge see that his lawyers were too over confident in winning the jury...therefore didn't put on the evidence that was lacking? Where were the people mentioned in Matt Daltons book? The neighbours who saw all those strange occurances concerning that brown van? The break ins...people seeing Laci...where were they?? Why didn't they get to put on their boat theory...that she was too heavy to put over the side of a boat without tipping it. So many reasons for appeal its pathetic...yet he will wait how many years for this??
I read many of the other posts in here..and say the same thing. The crime would defy logic. If he killed her..why bother to buy a boat..drive 90 miles to the bay and risk being seen? Why not dump her off any bridge in the area?? Why didn't cadaver dogs pick up a scent? The biggest one to me...what was the motive? Every crime has a motive unless its an act of passion in a split second. Why wait til she was 8 mths pregnant on Christmas Eve? They say his motive was freedom. I doubt this...was Amber worth the trouble? I'd think not...why take on a woman with a kid if their theory was he wanted no children??? He saw her what...3 times??? to kill ones wife for 3 rolls in the hay? I don't think so! Money? He had insurance for 3 years...and wasn't bad off financially...not to mention having quite wealthy parents who spoiled him....not worth the trouble for 150G??? Divorce was an option here...and I believe if he wanted out..he would have divorced her...with his parents help he would have come out very well! Many men pay child support.
So what other motives did he have? They say he was a sociopath. Ok....not one iota of anything strange in his past. Look at any serial killer or sociopathic killer....they will tell you they did have some history of something odd in their backround.
He is guilty because he didn't show emotion...if he had??? Accused of acting! No win situation here.
The lies about being in Europe....if he REALLY wanted to be with Amber...he could have come up with better lies. He obviously didn't want to be with her...or he could have!!!
AFter reading all the science about the tides ...I don't believe for one minute that the baby was in the water the same amount of time as Laci. I don't believe for a minute that the cord got around his neck by accident. I do hope there are good lawyers working on this case....to put a man on death row for some flimsy circumstantial evidence is a travesty of justice. I will admit, however, that I believe in the death penalty in some case...ones that there is 110% proof....like that Couey....taking and burying that little girl alive..and admitting it..the blood, semen and other evidence....this is a case I say....get rid of him fast!!!
I read many of the other posts in here..and say the same thing. The crime would defy logic. If he killed her..why bother to buy a boat..drive 90 miles to the bay and risk being seen? Why not dump her off any bridge in the area?? Why didn't cadaver dogs pick up a scent? The biggest one to me...what was the motive? Every crime has a motive unless its an act of passion in a split second. Why wait til she was 8 mths pregnant on Christmas Eve? They say his motive was freedom. I doubt this...was Amber worth the trouble? I'd think not...why take on a woman with a kid if their theory was he wanted no children??? He saw her what...3 times??? to kill ones wife for 3 rolls in the hay? I don't think so! Money? He had insurance for 3 years...and wasn't bad off financially...not to mention having quite wealthy parents who spoiled him....not worth the trouble for 150G??? Divorce was an option here...and I believe if he wanted out..he would have divorced her...with his parents help he would have come out very well! Many men pay child support.
So what other motives did he have? They say he was a sociopath. Ok....not one iota of anything strange in his past. Look at any serial killer or sociopathic killer....they will tell you they did have some history of something odd in their backround.
He is guilty because he didn't show emotion...if he had??? Accused of acting! No win situation here.
The lies about being in Europe....if he REALLY wanted to be with Amber...he could have come up with better lies. He obviously didn't want to be with her...or he could have!!!
AFter reading all the science about the tides ...I don't believe for one minute that the baby was in the water the same amount of time as Laci. I don't believe for a minute that the cord got around his neck by accident. I do hope there are good lawyers working on this case....to put a man on death row for some flimsy circumstantial evidence is a travesty of justice. I will admit, however, that I believe in the death penalty in some case...ones that there is 110% proof....like that Couey....taking and burying that little girl alive..and admitting it..the blood, semen and other evidence....this is a case I say....get rid of him fast!!!