|
Post by Maggie on Jan 17, 2006 8:59:22 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Maggie on Jan 17, 2006 9:02:15 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by sclcookie on Jan 18, 2006 2:43:58 GMT -5
so basically this DNA test is saying the same thing as the prior DNA test? I'm assuming. It's not excluding him, but it's not an exact match either? That's what I'm reading anyway.
|
|
|
Post by sclcookie on Jan 18, 2006 2:52:49 GMT -5
Actually, the DNA I'd like for them the re-test is Garrett's
I don't have faith in the Coleman issue. Garrett is the one I'm interesting in seeing.
|
|