lulu
Settlin' In
Posts: 29
|
Post by lulu on Jul 22, 2006 17:20:25 GMT -5
Art- we need to find out how many supporters want to participate. To those posting here- do you have access to any Peterson support sites or message boards? If so, do you think you could inform any member that wants to participate to come here and post on sign up list? Would that be a good idea? They could then come here and copy the draft when it's ready and send it. The owners of CCADP are very, very busy right now, but by the time we need to involve the media I will talk to them about representing us, or how that should work-- Dace has dealt with the media in the past on Scott's behalf. In the meantime.... I think we need to find out who is interested I'm sure I don't need to say this but count me in ;D Maggie I think it is a great idea and I will participate.
|
|
dove
Settlin' In
Posts: 46
|
Post by dove on Jul 22, 2006 18:03:28 GMT -5
I'll do anything I can, but i'm in Australia so I can't do alot besides letter writing.
ps. do you ever wonder who's reading this site? like the prosecution, modesto police etc. etc?
|
|
|
Post by bigoledog on Jul 27, 2006 18:18:51 GMT -5
what i have always found interesting is the sites that laci was supposed to be seen at is, no pregnant women came forward and said it was them at the site and not laci. i hope this makes sense.
|
|
stephanie
New Arrival
?All kids are gifted; some just open their packages earlier than others.?
Posts: 6
|
Post by stephanie on Jul 27, 2006 18:42:55 GMT -5
what i have always found interesting is the sites that laci was supposed to be seen at is, no pregnant women came forward and said it was them at the site and not laci. i hope this makes sense. That makes a lot of sense!! Good point.
|
|
|
Post by happyhaddock on Jul 27, 2006 20:25:49 GMT -5
I'll do anything I can, but i'm in Australia so I can't do alot besides letter writing. ps. do you ever wonder who's reading this site? like the prosecution, modesto police etc. etc? The MPD? Reading? I don't think so - unless it's aloud.
|
|
vipyr
New Arrival
Posts: 2
|
Post by vipyr on Jul 31, 2006 13:55:23 GMT -5
Greetings everyone. Im new here, and have not been able to read every single thread or post on the Peterson topic. But I have a question, that maybe someone can answer for me. How come the defense did not call upon, or was not allowed to call upon, the 5 or 6 witnesses that claim to have seen Lacy walking the dog after Scott left that morning??? Why was this not presented Ive just read the book presumed guilty, and I am absoluty astonished that the defense did not call these witnesses, or was not allowed to. There is absolutly no doubt in my mind that Scott was railroaded.. Hopefully, soon, an injustice will be fixed. Mark in Az
|
|
|
Post by happyhaddock on Jul 31, 2006 13:58:17 GMT -5
Greetings everyone. Im new here, and have not been able to read every single thread or post on the Peterson topic. But I have a question, that maybe someone can answer for me. How come the defense did not call upon, or was not allowed to call upon, the 5 or 6 witnesses that claim to have seen Lacy walking the dog after Scott left that morning??? Why was this not presented Ive just read the book presumed guilty, and I am absoluty astonished that the defense did not call these witnesses, or was not allowed to. There is absolutly no doubt in my mind that Scott was railroaded.. Hopefully, soon, an injustice will be fixed. Mark in Az No one knows to this day. Geragos called police officers and had them read the reports into the record -- that should have been enough but it seems it wasn't.
|
|
|
Post by glasgow85 on Aug 3, 2006 7:38:12 GMT -5
It seems that no matter who says they saw Laci after Scott left that morning, the Jury already and judge had already made up their mind that Scott was guilty and were not going to approve of these witnesses. I cannot believe the injustice in this case.
|
|
|
Post by artguy on Aug 3, 2006 10:10:24 GMT -5
I finished sending all the letters by Fed-X and the rest by email a few days ago. I changed the words a little, depending on who was receiving it. For the ACLU, I included something to the effect: “If our society has reached a point where we’re going to start killing people based solely on interpretations of their behavior and without any actual evidence, then God help us all.” To another, I added: “That so-called trial was nothing short of a state-sanctioned hate crime.”
I’ll post back if I get any replies. It’s going to take a lot of letters to really accomplish anything so hopefully a lot of other people will participate.
|
|