|
|
Post by caphill on Oct 22, 2005 17:41:17 GMT -5
Wonder what happened to the jurors who were trying to broker a book deal. Now that is a situation that leaves a bad taste in my mouth. A man sits on death row on a very questionable verdict with a mandatory appeal process in the works and this jury wants to write a book to justify how they reached their many different theories of how, when and where the murder took place. Actually it is book I would like to read. How a jury sentenced a man to death when they never agreed as one unity on the cause, the reason and the time of death. I would like to hear what "evidence" that was convincing for this premediated first degree for Laci and the second degree for Conner. To have so many different theories shows lack of any deliberations as a group of 12 to come to one mind. Maybe better described as MINDLESS!
|
|
|
|
Post by yummihunnibunni on Oct 22, 2005 18:14:53 GMT -5
I'll buy the book, but only because I've bought all of the books. Mainly for curiosity of what all of the parties thought and how they have felt changed by the situation in their own words. Sometimes I think its amazing how people think.... awe poor Laci and Connor and I wonder if right after that thought goes through their head, does a light bulb go off and they say" oh crap, i can make a lil cash from this" I feel very torn that I have bought the books and yet I don't believe in people who profit from someones demise. If Anne was tryin to be a part of the Peterson family or do the right thing by writing a book.... perhaps she should have donated the money to Scott Fund or to Laci's family... or some cause besides he bank account... and that goes for everyone who wrote a book. I agree with Smoke, I am going to buy this book because Matt Dalton was there, he consulted with Scott personally and prolly knows things that were never told, unlike the guy who wrote... inside the mind of SP... as if anyone could really get inside someone elses mind. He was a joke. I think Amber shouldn't have been allowed to write a book... and in a way, they all profited from the case and Laci's murder... perhaps they should get together and pool their fortune into something good... like correcting the legal system that is so screwed up. IMO.... not that it amounts to a hill of beans, just my thoughts.
Kisses xoxoxoxo Johnna
|
|
|
|
Post by Maggie on Oct 23, 2005 14:09:05 GMT -5
Wonder what happened to the jurors who were trying to broker a book deal. Now that is a situation that leaves a bad taste in my mouth. A man sits on death row on a very questionable verdict with a mandatory appeal process in the works and this jury wants to write a book to justify how they reached their many different theories of how, when and where the murder took place. Actually it is book I would like to read. How a jury sentenced a man to death when they never agreed as one unity on the cause, the reason and the time of death. I would like to hear what "evidence" that was convincing for this premediated first degree for Laci and the second degree for Conner. To have so many different theories shows lack of any deliberations as a group of 12 to come to one mind. Maybe better described as MINDLESS! I could not agree more!! This jury is MORONIC  If I can find multiple, multiple, multiple issues that contradict the prosecution's theory, right in the TESTIMONY!!....... why couldn't they find one shred of "reasonable doubt"....... Very, very SAD  They sent an innocent person to death row while the whole media brainwashed country supported it..... |
|
|
|
Post by yummihunnibunni on Oct 23, 2005 23:56:57 GMT -5
Honestly, if i were one of those jurors..... i would go to church everyday to bed for forgiveness for killin a man who was innocent and then move to mexico so i didnt have to walk around in shame where people would recognize me.
Kisses Johnna
|
|
|
|
Post by Maggie on Oct 25, 2005 7:35:09 GMT -5
Honestly, if i were one of those jurors..... i would go to church everyday to bed for forgiveness for killin a man who was innocent and then move to mexico so i didnt have to walk around in shame where people would recognize me. Kisses Johnna Hi Johnna, I often wonder how it affects jurors when they convict a person-- to DEATH yet! And then the person is exonerated. Can you imagine?? I wonder if the DA's and prosecutors that TRICKED them into believing in the persons guilt, beyond a reasonable doubt no less, offer any kind of free psychotherapy.... because I would sure need it if I were them. It's like killing an innocent person. I don't know.... maybe these so called "death qualified" juries are just a mindset I can't understand. It was reported that one of the Peterson jurors DID leave the country. The first foreman who felt threatened and got removed from the jury. I'm still interested to hear his take on the whole thing. As for the first few that came out blabbing... richelle nice and beratlis--- let's just say people like them are the reason I am ALL FOR "Professional Jurors". |
|
|
|
Post by yummihunnibunni on Oct 25, 2005 11:14:44 GMT -5
I have always had a soft spot for people who have been on death row. I cant help it but i feel so guilty when i think about the people who sit there, knowing that one day they are going to die. And its by the hands of another man and not the one it should be, God. Im all for taking criminals and locking them in jail. I pay taxes, lock em up but we cross the line when we decided that we can take another persons life, to justify what has been done. Most families that have lost a love one to murder, the ones that are for the dp say that they get closuer... does that mean they dont hurt? they dont cry and miss they loved one they lost? I think closure is an over rated and over used statement. there is no end to emotional pain, except death. so on the other hand what about the families that lose people to the dp. where is there closure? and why isnt it as accepted that they hurt and feel a loss. U never hear about the families that lose someone to the state, just the ones who lost someone to the convicted. Doesnt this country see that they are turning out alot of angry people? if i were the justice system id be afraid.
In scotts case, the guilt is deeper, because i believe 110% that he isnt guilty. There is no "evidence" or "facts" that u can lay before me that i wouldnt dispute, cause its all insane. I wonder how the jurors after this case were able to go on with a "normal" life. if i were to kill someone and admit it... you all would be like... "damn Johnna just killed that girl", do jurors fear that when they walk outside their houses. I have no problem looking anyone of them in the eyes and saying that they have committed 1st degree murder. I think the appeal process is just their way of murdering the soul so when the gas chamber comes up, they dont feel so bad taking the body, cause the soul is so much weaker. I think about scott everyday, and the fact that he may get the gas chamber. I feel so horrible. I love his family but am so glad that I am not closely related to them because i would shoot myself if i couldnt hug and kiss him. And I wonder how the jury thinks this has affected Jackie. This is her baby, her son. when, not if, scott is freed, if i were a jury member, i would definitely leave the country.how can u take a chance of running into the person that u sentenced to death?I fear that it will take some times before scott is released, because we all know that California doesnt wanna look like a bunch of asses and they will continue to cover for each other, and being that this is a national thing, having scott free would totally show that the justice system is corrupt.
Kisses Johnna
|
|
|
|
Post by yummihunnibunni on Oct 25, 2005 16:10:46 GMT -5
I dont know what was deleted.... but im sorry if i wrote something u didnt agree with truth. It was my opinion and im sure u remember what i said the other day about them
Kisses Johnna
|
|
|
|
Post by amyjason1 on Oct 26, 2005 12:20:37 GMT -5
Anne Byrds book spoke more of Jackie Peterson and the fact that she was adopted out than facts on Scott! The title 33 reason why my brother Scott is guilty intruiged me so I read it and found not one of those 33 reasons to really direct the murder in Scotts direction. nothing was substantial at all...
|
|
|
|
Post by yummihunnibunni on Oct 26, 2005 19:06:14 GMT -5
I actually bought Annes book and i hadnt read it. i started it this morning and i am amost done. throughout the book, i have had to stop... put it down and calm myself. besides Ambers book, they all want you to hate Jackie, thats rediculous to me. Shes a mother tryin to protect her son. I d do the same thing with my own child. Anne was busy being concerned with a ring and what happened to it. I know she said that she was "close to scott" but come on, she doubts him throughout the book. I would never ever say my brother killed anyone, no matter how guilty he looked to the media, especially when there wasnt enough evidence to convict him. I have tearfully started this book and am aiming to finish it tonight, just here cause i needed a break from Anne questioning the emotions of another person thatshe hadnt known as well as Laci or Jackie and Lee.
Kisses Johnna
|
|
|
|
Post by WaterLilly on Nov 6, 2005 19:37:40 GMT -5
I have always had a soft spot for people who have been on death row. I cant help it but i feel so guilty when i think about the people who sit there, knowing that one day they are going to die. And its by the hands of another man and not the one it should be, God. Im all for taking criminals and locking them in jail. I pay taxes, lock em up but we cross the line when we decided that we can take another persons life, to justify what has been done. Most families that have lost a love one to murder, the ones that are for the dp say that they get closuer... does that mean they dont hurt? they dont cry and miss they loved one they lost? I think closure is an over rated and over used statement. there is no end to emotional pain, except death. so on the other hand what about the families that lose people to the dp. where is there closure? and why isnt it as accepted that they hurt and feel a loss. U never hear about the families that lose someone to the state, just the ones who lost someone to the convicted. Doesnt this country see that they are turning out alot of angry people? if i were the justice system id be afraid. In scotts case, the guilt is deeper, because i believe 110% that he isnt guilty. There is no "evidence" or "facts" that u can lay before me that i wouldnt dispute, cause its all insane. I wonder how the jurors after this case were able to go on with a "normal" life. if i were to kill someone and admit it... you all would be like... "damn Johnna just killed that girl", do jurors fear that when they walk outside their houses. I have no problem looking anyone of them in the eyes and saying that they have committed 1st degree murder. I think the appeal process is just their way of murdering the soul so when the gas chamber comes up, they dont feel so bad taking the body, cause the soul is so much weaker. I think about scott everyday, and the fact that he may get the gas chamber. I feel so horrible. I love his family but am so glad that I am not closely related to them because i would shoot myself if i couldnt hug and kiss him. And I wonder how the jury thinks this has affected Jackie. This is her baby, her son. when, not if, scott is freed, if i were a jury member, i would definitely leave the country.how can u take a chance of running into the person that u sentenced to death?I fear that it will take some times before scott is released, because we all know that California doesnt wanna look like a bunch of asses and they will continue to cover for each other, and being that this is a national thing, having scott free would totally show that the justice system is corrupt. Kisses Johnna fyi California- Provides that lethal injection be administered unless the inmate requests lethal gas. |
|
|
|
Post by yummihunnibunni on Nov 6, 2005 21:55:15 GMT -5
Mel, thank u so much for pointing out that o so important fact, i was merly tryin to make a point.
|
|
|
|
Post by yummihunnibunni on Nov 6, 2005 22:10:24 GMT -5
i apologize for the sacasum, it just dosent feel good when u get online and see that almost every post that u have posted is turned around and used against u, even the little things.
|
|
|
|
Post by falcon on Nov 11, 2005 15:11:54 GMT -5
Of course this guy is going to write a book. He may make a lot of bucks. If this lawyer was part of the defense team and was passionate about peterson's innocense, then this web site should see a HUGE donation. If not, well, he's just another lawyer doing what lawyers do best.
|
|
