Scott peterson innocent?

[bourney92]

I would like to see your views about scott being innocent...

[CCADP]

U need to add the option :

GUILT NOT PROVEN (the trial had so many grevious errors; poisoning of the jury pool etc; false reporting; media that affected the jury during trial when they were supposed to be sequestered etc...read the PDF file of the defense motion for a new trial at Scott's page at www.ccadp.org/scottpeterson.htm

I would vote GUILT NOT PROVEN - that certainly no one can be sure of his guilt based on the trial that he had. Even the judge midway through trial; on the record; said the case is "an appellate lawyers petri dish".

[bourney92]

oops if you want NOT PROVEN then reply saying so

[freerob]

bourney92 said:

oops if you want NOT PROVEN then reply saying so

LOL!! cheeky devil! ;D ;D ;D

[CCADP]

Definately NOT PROVEN.

[bourney92]

whats not proven meen

[CCADP]

The prosecution did not prove he was guilty in a fair trial.

(he was convicted but it was far from a fair or regular trial)

[bourney92]

ok so the trial was not fair

[sclcookie]

I think he's guilty. But I don't know much about his case to make an educated opinion about it, so I'll read up on it. In the meantime, I put guilty, but I can't debate that or give a valid reason for it.

hugggz,
Suzanne

(now I guess that disproves that all of us anti's believe everyone on DR is innocent ....still don't want Scott Peterson executed regardless on my beliefs of his guilt or innocense.)

[damaris]

I think he's guilty also but like Suzanne said, I'll have to read on it.

[truth1]

sclcookie said:

I think he's guilty. But I don't know much about his case to make an educated opinion about it, so I'll read up on it. In the meantime, I put guilty, but I can't debate that or give a valid reason for it.

hugggz,
Suzanne

(now I guess that disproves that all of us anti's believe everyone on DR is innocent ....still don't want Scott Peterson executed regardless on my beliefs of his guilt or innocense.)

[jill]

Scott is definately innocent of this crime. He was the only suspect that the MPD focused on from day one without any evidence besides a theory they put this man on death row and then patted themselves on the back ! The igored obvious evidence such as the tips from Tracy and the burglars. There is even a phone call that proves that Scott is innocent.
Scott may not have been a perfect husband , have not met one yet , LOL !
But seriously Scott is innocent in everyway !
I noticed some of you said you were not sure so I will invite you to visit our site www.savescottslife.com so you can read up and form an opinion.

[adrienne]

deleted by Suzanne

[jill]

adrienne said:

I voted guilty because: the info. as presented by the media sure made him look guilty (on the other hand, American television also made it look like there were WMD's in Iraq!), and a jury found him so...
That said, the quick glance I've had at the information seems he sure deserves a second trial - I don't know enough about the case but hopefully this website will help me get more accurate info. But the main reason I've joined this site (I've looked at it many times over the last year or two), is that no one should be put to death - and Scott Peterson's case is the first one I've really followed (through the media) that ended up with someone on death row.

This is a perfect example of how the media tried and convicted Scott Peterson long before his trial ever started. adrienne, I hope that after you read the information you can see what the media has done to this man. Even if you continue to believe Scott is guilty I hope you can at least see what was done to him.

[catskillz]

He could be guilty, he could be innocent. No-one but scott himself can be sure of either one imo. I'm still under the impression that he's guilty, but that is not based on the grounds that are needed for a conviction (eg a theory, motive). Imo there's a lack of enough credible evidence for a conviction, let alone a death sentence.

Catz